Canada's Core is European

'Decolonisation' is just a way to smuggle in hatred of the West.

Le Château Frontenac, QC. Via Wikimedia. Credit: Quintin Soloviev

Three years ago, the acting vice-chancellor of Cambridge University, Dr Anthony Freeling, made a confession, widely reported in the British press. He confessed that he was baffled by ‘decolonisation’. The word, he said, “has been misused to such an extent that I don’t think, if I’m honest, I can give an accurate definition”.

I sympathise—as, I strongly suspect, do millions of others. That’s because ‘decolonisation’ can mean a variety of different things, some of which make good sense, but others, very bad sense indeed. And the bad ones have smuggled themselves into schools and university departments under cover of the good.

The original and most natural home of ‘decolonisation’ is in former European colonies. There it can mean something entirely reasonable. For example, in 1986 the Kenyan novelist and playwright, Ngugi wa Thiong’o published a book with the title, Decolonising the Mind. Here he argued that African literature should be written in African languages, such as his own Gikuyu. Why? So that Africans can recover a sense of self-respect and stop being in thrall to the assumption that whatever comes out of Europe is better. To which the only sensible response is surely, “Yes, of course.”

When translated out of its original, post-colony context and into contemporary Britain or Canada, ‘decolonisation’ can still make some good sense. It can mean correcting the neglect in school curricula of the history of immigration and the contribution of immigrants to our country.

Or it can mean that important texts that have been excluded from reading lists in schools and universities, just because of prejudice against the race of their authors (and not because of their poor quality) should be included.

If it is true that the history of immigration and the multicultural reality of Britain and Canada have been neglected, and if it is true that important texts have been excluded just because of the colour of an author’s skin-colour, then curricula should indeed be ‘decolonised’. If those things are true—and have been shown to be true.

The Empress Hotel in Victoria, BC. Credit: Miladla Ferrari, via Wikimedia

So far, so much good sense.

Much less reasonable, however, is the opposition of ‘decolonisation’ to ‘Eurocentricity’ and its insistence on shifting attention to non-European histories and cultures. On the contrary, a certain Euro-centricity in British and Canadian education is entirely justified.